11/1/2023 0 Comments Out ackGeneral rule of thumb was 5% - 10% but required dynamic testing to obtaion the optimal value for any given link distance / radio CPU overhead delay. This amount depends on the processor speed to link distance ratio. ![]() You needed to add a small percentage to accommodate processor overhead delay. With the classic broadcoms and the afore mentioned firmware the ACK timing field is accurate for the distance between the radios. You set the ack timing to 2 times the actual distance of the link for round trip (assuming 1 true) Since I'm hardcore "If it ain't broke, don't fix it", I never looked into the newer DD-WRT versions other than an occasional tryst to see what was happening.Ģ). 04-18-06 micro version of DD-WRT, which I still use on some new installs, does have a very functional ACK timing for the older broadcom radios. ![]() V24 I believe is based on a new broadcom wireless driver that dropped ACK support. I ran my own 3.5 mile link with a pair of Buffy HP radios for about 2 years and could max out my 10 Mbps cable connection with it. I recall asking BS 7 or 8 years ago in one of my posts in the old forum to support ACK timing, and to my delight he eventually did ). Pre V24 typically supported ACK timing for the classic broadcom chipsets ( Unless you go too far back. Like many features this depends on the particular firmware release. ack timing does not work for broadcom devices (true / no) Those are two very excellent observations !ġ). I saw that sig in the xbox forums and liked it. ![]() Was that something you did to be cute or have you been moderated for something ? I would be happy to share my first hand knowledge and could comment on most of your points, but the message at the end of your post has me a bit worried.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |